Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Date
Msg-id CACjxUsN+OJexxdBp5U-nfh7cF7iaHCng-odEhp6DE=uNgYRacQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:40 PM Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Rebased.

It applies and builds clean, it passed make world with cassert and TAP
tests, and I can't see any remaining flaws.  This is true both of just
the 0001 v16 patch and that with 0002 v16 applied on top of it.

It would be great if someone with a big test machine could stress test
and benchmark this versus current production versions.

-- 
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: automatic restore point
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 11 release notes