Thanks, David.
If I try to do something like:
EXECUTE SELECT INTO ARRAY_AGG(t.*) INTO result_records
Would internally use cursors too and have the same restrictions?
Cheers,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 19:22, David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, 11:10 Joan Pujol <joanpujol@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I want to execute an SQL query and process its results inside a stored
>> procedure without preventing query parallelism. Since I don't want to
>> prevent query parallelism, cursors can't be used, and I would like to
>> avoid creating a temporal table.
>>
>> Is this possible? If so, what is the best way to execute the query,
>> retrieve all results in memory, and process them inside the stored
>> procedure?
>
>
> You must use create table as if you want a result that is both accessible to subsequent statements and uses
parallelismto be produced. There is no saving results into memory - you either save them explicitly or iterate over
themand the later prevents parallelism as you've noted.
>
> David J.
--
Joan Jesús Pujol Espinar
http://www.joanpujol.cat
