Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Friedman
Subject Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage
Date
Msg-id CACbFw62-WR9sgwXv8nQ7Co0szBOrkqmcHhRP7T+s0b9VuVmuUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage
List pgsql-hackers
>I decided to leave this out, since I just remembered that the most
> likely change is actually to move to 64-bit offsets, as was proposed
> here and has some enthusiastic support:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACG=ezaWg7_nt-8ey4aKv2w9LcuLthHknwCawmBgEeTnJrJTcw@mail.gmail.com

Thanks for the review and the draft, looks good to me, and I'm okay
with doing this without the code comments. However, it seems like that
thread is just the beginning of wider changes (if they indeed happen),
which may impact these calculations as well, and then maybe a doc
update reminder may come in useful?

Best regards,

Alex Friedman



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: what's going on with lapwing?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: making EXPLAIN extensible