On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:50 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 1:03 AM John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:17 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think what doc means to say is
> > > that it copies any unlinked files present in primary's new cluster
> > > (which in your case will be data2).
> >
> > In that case, I'm still confused why that doc says, "Unfortunately,
> > rsync needlessly copies files associated with temporary and unlogged
> > tables because these files don't normally exist on standby servers."
> > I fail to see why the primary's new cluster would have these if they
> > weren't linked.
> >
>
> Why unlogged files won't be in primary's new cluster? After the
> upgrade, they should be present in a new cluster if they were present
> in the old cluster.
I assume they would be linked, however (I haven't checked this). I did
think rewritten VM files would fall under this, but I was confused
about unlogged files.
> > And in the case we're discussing here, the skipped
> > FSMs won't be on data2, so won't end up in standby/data2.
> >
>
> Right. I think we are safe with respect to rsync because I have seen
> that we do rewrite the vm files in link mode and rsync will copy them
> from primary's new cluster.
Okay.
> I think you can try to address my other comments on your pg_upgrade
> patch. Once we agree on the code, we need to test below scenarios:
> (a) upgrade from all supported versions to the latest version
> (b) upgrade standby with and without using rsync.
Sounds good.
--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
