Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Kreen
Subject Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API
Date
Msg-id CACMqXCJzumEdF78+itFcp_u0_Q_0h+2OWzkkqNyG6t7qk+B7Mw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> But, the faster rowbuf method is a generally incompatible way of
> dealing with data vs current libpq -- this is bad.  If it's truly
> impossible to get those benefits without bypassing result API that
> then I remove my objection on the grounds it's optional behavior (my
> gut tells me it is possible though).

Um, please clarify what are you talking about here?

What is the incompatibility of PGresult from branch 1?

-- 
marko


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API