Re: [PATCH] ltree hash functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From jian he
Subject Re: [PATCH] ltree hash functions
Date
Msg-id CACJufxHJKxQ=foYiOzbtd2mSTn-CXyKd6za0eR73moToUA6uJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] ltree hash functions  (Tommy Pavlicek <tommypav122@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] ltree hash functions
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 8:44 AM Tommy Pavlicek <tommypav122@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Patch updated for those comments (and a touch of cleanup in the tests) attached.

it would be a better name as hash_ltree than ltree_hash, similar logic
applies to ltree_hash_extended.
that would be the convention. see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/69650940/15603477


Other than that, it looks good.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: proposal: plpgsql - OPEN LOCAL statement
Next
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes