On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 8:44 AM Tommy Pavlicek <tommypav122@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Patch updated for those comments (and a touch of cleanup in the tests) attached.
it would be a better name as hash_ltree than ltree_hash, similar logic
applies to ltree_hash_extended.
that would be the convention. see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/69650940/15603477
Other than that, it looks good.