Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From jian he
Subject Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug
Date
Msg-id CACJufxGsB1ciahkNDccyxhw-Pfp_-_y+Wx+1BOdRyVVxKojAbg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug
List pgsql-hackers
looking around.
I found other three minor issues. attached.

I am not sure the pg_class "relam" description part is correct. since
partitioned indexes (relkind "I") also have the access method, but no
storage.
"
If this is a table or an index, the access method used (heap, B-tree,
hash, etc.); otherwise zero (zero occurs for sequences, as well as
relations without storage, such as views)
"

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Force the old transactions logs cleanup even if checkpoint is skipped
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Why do indexes and sorts use the database collation?