Re: bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From jian he
Subject Re: bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445)
Date
Msg-id CACJufxFfbDhKiNHs8+pnZcZMtOHiANcXzV=JG_Qf=bhi6=vL7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445)  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses 回复: bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:11 PM Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 09:16, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > + oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(estate->es_query_cxt);
> > +
> > + node->as_epq_tupdesc = lookup_rowtype_tupdesc_copy(tupType, tupTypmod);
> > +
> > + ExecAssignExprContext(estate, &node->ps);
> > +
> > + node->ps.ps_ProjInfo =
> > + ExecBuildProjectionInfo(castNode(Append, node->ps.plan)->epq_targetlist,
> > +
> > EvalPlanQualStart, EvalPlanQualNext will switch the memory context to
> > es_query_cxt.
> > so the memory context switch here is not necessary?
> >
>
> Yes it is necessary. The EvalPlanQual mechanism switches to the
> epqstate->recheckestate->es_query_cxt memory context, which is not the
> same as the main query's estate->es_query_cxt (they're different
> executor states). Most stuff allocated under EvalPlanQual() is
> intended to be short-lived (just for the duration of that specific EPQ
> check), whereas this stuff (the TupleDesc and Projection) is intended
> to last for the duration of the main query, so that it can be reused
> in later EPQ checks.
>
sorry for the noise. I understand it now.

Another small question:
for the Append case, we can set/initialize it at create_append_plan,
all other elements are initialized there,
why we set it at set_append_references.
just wondering.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve readability by using designated initializers when possible
Next
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby