typedef struct JsonTableExecContext
{
int magic;
JsonTablePlanState *rootplanstate;
JsonTablePlanState **colexprplans;
} JsonTableExecContext;
imho, this kind of naming is kind of inconsistent.
"state" and "plan" are mixed together.
maybe
typedef struct JsonTableExecContext
{
int magic;
JsonTablePlanState *rootplanstate;
JsonTablePlanState **colexprstates;
} JsonTableExecContext;
+ cxt->colexprplans = palloc(sizeof(JsonTablePlanState *) *
+ list_length(tf->colvalexprs));
+
/* Initialize plan */
- cxt->rootplanstate = JsonTableInitPlan(cxt, rootplan, args,
+ cxt->rootplanstate = JsonTableInitPlan(cxt, (Node *) rootplan, NULL, args,
CurrentMemoryContext);
I think, the comments "Initialize plan" is not right, here we
initialize the rootplanstate (JsonTablePlanState)
and also for each (no ordinality) columns, we also initialized the
specific JsonTablePlanState.
static void JsonTableRescan(JsonTablePlanState *planstate);
@@ -331,6 +354,9 @@ static Datum JsonTableGetValue(TableFuncScanState
*state, int colnum,
Oid typid, int32 typmod, bool *isnull);
static void JsonTableDestroyOpaque(TableFuncScanState *state);
static bool JsonTablePlanNextRow(JsonTablePlanState *planstate);
+static bool JsonTablePlanPathNextRow(JsonTablePlanState *planstate);
+static void JsonTableRescan(JsonTablePlanState *planstate);
JsonTableRescan included twice?
