Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Maxim Orlov
Subject Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions
Date
Msg-id CACG=ezb5GwFUYrPSy5nRJ7-o60YZvzQyfrETqSYy1uGJkE=53g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions  (Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 11:02, Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com> wrote:
But are there any reasons to allow us to DROP such tables?
Hi!

This topic has already been discussed in [0], I believe. I'm not sure how it all ended and if there were any changes made in the end. But from the user's perspective, temporary tables are expected to be isolated within sessions, I think. This is an ideal solution, but does it feasible or not is a question.

BTW, if we can "isolate" temp relations, we'll be one step close to get rid of temp relations locking [1].
 

--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Next
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum