Re: signal 11: Segmentation fault ; query constraint list; pg16.3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From milist ujang
Subject Re: signal 11: Segmentation fault ; query constraint list; pg16.3
Date
Msg-id CACG9ogw1sGqX5vc=X9922tvN7dKJnazhnyjHXtF0ppY3=G=3ZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: signal 11: Segmentation fault ; query constraint list; pg16.3  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
as of subject, it should be 16.3.

scenario was:
- a few months ago install + deployed user data pg 16.2.
- 2 days ago, updated to 16.3

now I can reproduce the issue, the segment fault comes from 
postgres[495645]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f318b17e1f4 sp 00007ffc7f1b15d8 error 4 in citus.so[7f318b0a4000+ee000] likely on CPU 93 (core 1, socket 1)

after dropping the citus extension, now it's OK.

Thanks for the reply.


On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 6:01 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 22:32, milist ujang <ujang.milist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> postgres 16.1; rocky 9.3
>
> when connect to database postgres this query is OK, but run on user database, got segmentation fault.

I tried your query on 16.1 and I'm unable to reproduce the crash.

Are you able to recreate this on a freshly installed instance after
creating the table in question? If not, does it crash after you do a
pg_dump --schema-only from the problem database and restoring that to
the fresh instance and running ANALYZE? The crash may depend on the
query plan chosen and that will depend on the schema in that database.

We're probably going to need a recreator script for this. You might be
able to come up with one from doing the --schema-only dump and
restoring that somewhere and dropping unrelated objects to find the
minimum set you need for the crash.

Alternatively, a stack trace would be useful. See:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Linux/BSD

David


--
regards

ujang jaenudin | Self-Employed, DBA Consultant
http://id.linkedin.com/pub/ujang-jaenudin/12/64/bab

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sašo Gantar
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with query
Next
From: Erik Wienhold
Date:
Subject: Re: How to update upper-bound of tstzrange ?