Re: replication consistency checking - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Ravi Krishna
Subject Re: replication consistency checking
Date
Msg-id CACER=P2AGvLwOthmQDXj3caS=S8XSPr5zBNTo92jAbXMJFjkhw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: replication consistency checking  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-admin
> I believe MySQL needed such a tool because it had known replication
> synchronization problems  ---  Postgres does not, so has no such tool.

I agree with Bruce here. In DB2, for HADR (similar to PG replication)
there is no tool which checks whether primary and standby are same so
that there is no surprise after a failover. I am pretty same is true
for Oracle Dataguard.

If a RDBMS is offering a tool to check for consistency, there is a
high likelihood it is because of inherent problems.


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: replication consistency checking
Next
From: Greg Clough
Date:
Subject: Re: replication consistency checking