Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shulgin, Oleksandr
Subject Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions
Date
Msg-id CACACo5T67Pto=SAyUDCEUZ0vodVTSp9cup7RwCFzxmeUi=RR5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions
Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

The thing is - it's not only about whitespace, otherwise I would probably not bother with the generic interface. For my original problem, there is simply no way to do this correctly in an extension w/o copying over all of the logic from json.c, which I have to do right now, would rather not.

I am sorry - we are talking about JSON, not about any styled document. I disagree, so it has not be implemented as extension - the backport of JSON support is a extension.

Hm... I'm having a hard time making sense of that statement, sorry.

To reiterate: for my problem, that is escaping numerics that can potentially overflow[1] under ECMAScript standard, I want to be able to override the code that outputs the numeric converted to string.  There is no way in current implementation to do that *at all*, short of copying all the code involved in producing JSON output and changing it at certain points.  One could try re-parsing JSON instead, but that doesn't actually solve the issue, because type information is lost forever at that point.

The whitespace unification was a mere side-effect of the original effort on this patch.

--
Best regards,
Alex


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions