> Does it make sense to you guys to discuss compression outside of TLS? > There are potentially huge bandwidth savings which could benefit both > WAN and non-WAN scenarios, and decoupling this problem from TLS would > make it both accessible to everyone (assuming PostgreSQL clients > follow). It would be a protocol change though.
I personally don't think it's something that should be implemented in PostgreSQL core. As a third-party TCP-proxy (on both client and server sides) with gzip/lz4 support perhaps. I'll be not surprised if it turns out that such projects already exist.
I guess since the usual answer for compression was "use what SSL provides you for free", it's rather unlikely that someone bothered to make a proxy just for that purpose, and really, a proxy is just another moving part in your setup: not everyone will be thrilled to add that.
