On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Gilles Darold <gilles.darold@dalibo.com> writes: > Then, should I have to use an alternate file to store the information or > implement a bidirectional communication with the syslogger?
I'd just define a new single-purpose file $PGDATA/log_file_name or some such.
Would it make sense to have it as a symlink instead?