dividing privileges for replication role. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I made a patch to divide privileges for replication role.

Currently(9.2), the privilege for replication role is
true / false which means that standby server is able to
connect to another server or not with the replication role.

This management and cascading replication make a strange behavior.
Because cascading replication is able to connect to another standby server,
we can see the cyclic situation.

This behavior has been discussed on Hackers-list(1),
but the conclusion was that's difficult to detect the situation.
(1) http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/50D12E8F.8000808@agliodbs.com

And then, I've reported a Bug-list(2) about this.
In this discussion, an idea that controlling
replication-connection with GUC parameter or privileges on
replication role comes up.
I think these can not avoid cyclic situation but will make some help for
DBA.
(2) http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1TtVvj-0004B3-2Z@wrigleys.postgresql.org


In this patch, I made below.
a) adding new privileges for replication:"MASTER REPLICATION" and "CASCADE REPLICATION"
   "MASTER REPLICATION":  Replication-connection to master server is only allowed
   "CASCADE REPLICATION": Replication-connection to cascade server is only allowed
   ("REPLICATION" already implemented means replication-connection to both servers is allowed)
b) addin above options in createuser command
   --master-replication
   --cascade-replication
c) dumping pg_authid.rolreplication value in pg_dumpall
   is changed by server version like this:
   from 9.1
     true  -> master-replication
     false -> noreplication
   from 9.2
     true  -> replication(master & cascade)
     false -> noreplication

I've not write any documents and tests for this yet,
but I want any comments whether this change is needed or not.

regards,
---------
NTT Software Corporation
Tomonari Katsumata

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Contrib PROGRAM problem