Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Subject Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations
Date
Msg-id CAC+AXB0Pj9=mtk+-oQJg-X5GyiTOfn_cOWYS4VBt-w3+J5rX5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations
List pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:55 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

On 2023-02-27 Mo 17:20, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:


Hmm, yeah. I'm not sure I understand the point of this test anyway:


SELECT to_char(date '2010-03-01', 'DD TMMON YYYY' COLLATE "de_DE");


Uhm, they probably don't make much sense except for "tr_TR", so I'm fine with removing them. PFA a patch for so.

Regards,

Juan José Santamaría Flecha
 
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)