On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> While it would be a reasonably simple change to make this work as
>> originally intended, I'm strongly tempted to just rip it out instead,
>> and only support the SQL-mandated syntax. If anyone was using this
>> undocumented feature, you'd think they'd have complained sometime in
>> the last ten years. And making it work would really entail adding
>> documentation and a regression test case, so it'd be substantially
>> more effort than just killing the "list_length == 1" case.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>
> For what it's worth, that seems reasonable to me as well. I would
> never have found this if I weren't actually looking through gram.y
> anyway.
>
> --
> Josh
Attaching a patch to just remove the n == 1 case.
--
Josh
