Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lætitia Avrot
Subject Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance
Date
Msg-id CAB_COdi1hrXS_ZZ6JGGGWCsAcMWR1HtgkvtxxUgSSCfqACsYzQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks,  Tom ! 

Thank you everyone for your help and patience. 

Cheers, 

Lætitia 

Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 20:57, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :
Lætitia Avrot <laetitia.avrot@gmail.com> writes:
> So, as you're asking that too, maybe my reasons weren't good enough. You'll
> find enclosed a new version of the patch
> with asinh, acosh and atanh (v5).

Pushed with some minor adjustments (mainly cleanup of the error handling).

> Then I tried for several days to implement the 6 last hyperbolic functions,
> but I wasn't satisfied with the result, so I just dropped it.

Yeah, I agree that sech() and so on are not worth the trouble.  If they
were commonly used, they'd be in POSIX ...

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Maxence Ahlouche
Date:
Subject: Show a human-readable n_distinct in pg_stats view
Next
From: Evgeniy Efimkin
Date:
Subject: Re: Special role for subscriptions