Re: multicolumn index and setting effective_cache_size using human-readable-numbers - Mailing list pgsql-general

I'm sure I'm missing something here.

A query takes 50 seconds; it's doing a seq-scan on a joined table,
even though the table is joined via a field that's the leftmost column
in a multicolumn index
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/indexes-multicolumn.html
says "equality constraints on leading columns ... will be used to
limit the portion of the index that is scanned")

http://explain.depesz.com/s/suv

If I create an individual index on just the linked key, the explain
shows the index being used and the query takes 1.7s.

http://explain.depesz.com/s/b9ZS

Now here's the odd bit:

  SET effective_cache_size TO '2146435072'

causes the index to be used.

   SET effective_cache_size TO '2047MB'

causes it to use tablescan. Shouldn't those two be equivalent?

Is
there a blowup in the planner checking effective_cache_size value not
expecting the human-readable value?

Thanks for suggestions

Geoff


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general