Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Date
Msg-id CABV9wwP1TjLk4ZKuf4s0r_HWtny+ZK4DQr2BUFnUseQPwx5P9w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:49 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 02:43:19PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> > FWIW, when I have built these types of systems in the past, and when I
> > wanted an aggressive recheck-type mechanism, the most common methods
> > involved tying it to autovacuum_max_workers.
>
> Would you mind elaborating on this point?  Do you mean that you'd rebuild
> the list every a_m_w tables, or something else?
>

Yes.


Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread