On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 02:50:55PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:49 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 02:43:19PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
>> > FWIW, when I have built these types of systems in the past, and when I
>> > wanted an aggressive recheck-type mechanism, the most common methods
>> > involved tying it to autovacuum_max_workers.
>>
>> Would you mind elaborating on this point? Do you mean that you'd rebuild
>> the list every a_m_w tables, or something else?
>
> Yes.
Interesting. With our defaults, that would mean rebuilding the list every
few tables, which seems quite aggressive. I'd start worrying about the
pg_class scanning overhead a little...
--
nathan
