Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Date
Msg-id aROTJV90-PUY1OZj@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread  (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>)
Responses Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 02:43:19PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> FWIW, when I have built these types of systems in the past, and when I
> wanted an aggressive recheck-type mechanism, the most common methods
> involved tying it to autovacuum_max_workers.

Would you mind elaborating on this point?  Do you mean that you'd rebuild
the list every a_m_w tables, or something else?

-- 
nathan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumdb: add --dry-run
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends