On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Selena Deckelmann <selena@chesnok.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/10/2014 01:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>> John Graber escribió:
>>>
>>>> So, I looked into "PUG" in Milwaukee. We have a local user group for
>>>> PHP
>>>> of 319 members, created in 2009, that uses "PUG".
>>>>
>>>> I absolutely understand why "PUG" would be preferable to some folks.
>>>> And
>>>> this being community driven, I will *_absolutely_* go with it if that's
>>>> the
>>>> consensus, now worries. But as for myself, I'd really like to
>>>> differentiate my merry band from other user groups in Milwaukee if
>>>> possible. :)
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone else willing to share some feedback? Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> As far as postgresql.org mailing lists are concerned, we typically
>>> assign names that have "PUG" somewhere supposedly because it's an
>>> acronym for "Postgres User Group".
>>
>>
>> It or the actual name desired, BrewPUB , makes complete sense to me. From
>> someone who has downed their fair share of Milwaukee brewed beers.
>
>
> +1
>
> As the number of groups grow, I'm happy to have local organizers use some
> imagination.
>
ISTM it's up to the organizers to decide what works best for their
locale. My only caution to John would be that BrewPUB is probably
going to get a lot more false positives than BrewPUG, since brewpub
are a very popular thing that is entirely different. In the end
though, up to John imo.
Robert Treat
play: xzilla.net
work: omniti.com
