On 11/02/14 12:19, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Selena Deckelmann <selena@chesnok.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2014 01:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>> John Graber escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> So, I looked into "PUG" in Milwaukee. We have a local user group for
>>>>> PHP
>>>>> of 319 members, created in 2009, that uses "PUG".
>>>>>
>>>>> I absolutely understand why "PUG" would be preferable to some folks.
>>>>> And
>>>>> this being community driven, I will *_absolutely_* go with it if that's
>>>>> the
>>>>> consensus, now worries. But as for myself, I'd really like to
>>>>> differentiate my merry band from other user groups in Milwaukee if
>>>>> possible. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone else willing to share some feedback? Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> As far as postgresql.org mailing lists are concerned, we typically
>>>> assign names that have "PUG" somewhere supposedly because it's an
>>>> acronym for "Postgres User Group".
>>>
>>> It or the actual name desired, BrewPUB , makes complete sense to me. From
>>> someone who has downed their fair share of Milwaukee brewed beers.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> As the number of groups grow, I'm happy to have local organizers use some
>> imagination.
>>
> ISTM it's up to the organizers to decide what works best for their
> locale. My only caution to John would be that BrewPUB is probably
> going to get a lot more false positives than BrewPUG, since brewpub
> are a very popular thing that is entirely different. In the end
> though, up to John imo.
>
>
> Robert Treat
> play: xzilla.net
> work: omniti.com
>
>
mpDBug - Milwaukee Postgres DataBase User Group?
Just a suggestion...
Cheers,
Gavin
