On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 1:32 AM Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com> wrote:
>
> Le 09/03/2022 à 22:10, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 08:38:04AM +0100, Gilles Darold wrote:
>
> Maybe it's clearer to write this with =ANY() / != ALL() ?
> See 002.
>
> I have applied your changes and produced a new version v3 of the patch,
> thanks for the improvements. The patch have been added to commitfest
> interface, see here https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3587/
>
> I wondered whether my patches were improvements, and it occurred to me that
> your patch didn't fail if the specified schema didn't exist. That's arguably
> preferable, but that's the pre-existing behavior for tables. So I think the
> behavior of my patch is more consistent.
>
> +1
>
+1 for consistency.
Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net
