Hi, Am Sonntag, den 04.03.2018, 23:30 +0100 schrieb Daniel Gustafsson: > Agreed. Looking at our current error messages, “in file” is conventionally > followed by the filename. I do however think “calculated” is better than > “expected” since it conveys clearly that the compared checksum is calculated by > pg_verify_checksum and not read from somewhere. > > How about something like this? > > _(“%s: checksum mismatch in file \”%s\”, block %d: calculated %X, found %X”), > progname, fn, blockno, csum, header->pd_checksum);
I still find that confusing, but maybe it's just me. I thought the one in the pageheader is the "expected" checksum, and we compare the "found" or "computed/calculated" (in the page itself) against it.
I had the same conversation with an external tool author, by the way:
Maybe we should just say "on disk" for the one that's on disk, would that break the confusion? So "calculated %X, found %X on disk"?
