On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> >> wrote: >>> It's fairly common to see a lot of "Incomplete startup packet" in the >>> logfiles caused by monitoring or healthcheck connections.
>> I've also seen it caused by port scanning.
> Yes, definitely. Question there might be if that's actually a case when we > *want* that logging?
I should think someone might. But I doubt we want to introduce another GUC for this. Would it be okay to downgrade the message to DEBUG1 if zero bytes were received?
Yeah, that was my suggestion - I think that's a reasonable compromise. And yes, I agree that a separate GUC for it would be a huge overkill.
