Re: [translators] [press-regional] 9.6 Release Translations - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [translators] [press-regional] 9.6 Release Translations
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzWM5bWxoAWzuz5SAx64G1-hAhntT7cqMsetRrOwnEzMA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [translators] [press-regional] 9.6 Release Translations  (Josh berkus <josh@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [translators] [press-regional] 9.6 Release Translations  (Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@2ndquadrant.it>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Josh berkus <josh@postgresql.org> wrote:
On 09/29/2016 10:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Euler Taveira wrote:
>>> On 29-09-2016 10:42, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
>>>>   if I click here https://www.postgresql.org/about/press/presskit96/
>>>> unfortunately I am not redirected to the Italian page (which exists and
>>>> is here: https://www.postgresql.org/about/press/presskit96/it/). I am
>>>> not sure content negotiation is working properly.
>>>>
>>> If you go About > Press, you see all translation links available. I
>>> agree with you that a link inside every translated press would be good.
>
> I previously said:
>  I think the only reasonable option is that the pgweb code fills in the
>  list of available translations in front of each one, based on the files
>  that exist in the server.  Perhaps the way to do this would be to put
>  the translations in the database; that would also make it easier to add
>  new translations as they arrive.
>
>  Obviously, it's not something that's to happen for 9.6, but if someone
>  is willing to hack pgweb for pg10 ...
>
> One more thing I just noticed.  If you go to the front page, the
> featured content box has links to the announcement, but it is not
> possible to get to the translated release kits, nor there is any
> indication that they exist at all.  I don't think this has been properly
> considered.

I was operating under the assumption that the translationed versions
showed up automatically, as they did on the old website code.  I wasn't
aware that they didn't, anymore.  In 4 years (or more)?  this is the
first time anyone has brought it up.

I think you actually have to go back two generations of the website code for that. Which is definitely more than 4 years.. 

--

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Press coverage for 9.6
Next
From: Gabriele Bartolini
Date:
Subject: Re: [translators] [press-regional] 9.6 Release Translations