Re: Small race in pg_xlogdump --follow - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Small race in pg_xlogdump --follow
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzBFutx6piBKu0EOcUDJ18BzgiQAiZ5zMV=HWXg2WSDog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Small race in pg_xlogdump --follow  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Oh, right, at the very last loop. I've never seen it need more than 1 loop
> so I didn't manage to hit that codepath :) But yeah, saving errno and
> restoring it on the other side of pg_usleep is probably a good idea.

Right.  On a larger scale --- I'm too uncaffeinated to figure out whether
this is the code path taken for the initially user-supplied file name.
But it would be unfriendly if when you fat-finger the command line
arguments, it takes 5 seconds for pg_xlogdump to tell you so.  Maybe
the looping behavior should only happen on non-first file access.

It's a different codepath, so the retry does not happen on that. Different error message, even. ("could not open file" vs "could not find file"). 

I'll go commit this including a source code comment about why the loop is there that was missing.

--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade from 9.5 to 9.6 fails with "invalid argument"