Re: longstanding mingw warning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: longstanding mingw warning
Date
Msg-id CABUevEz7GJL+CGSX7HUmiSu1EOQOP15OZ1Fep4OxTu_p5OdP6w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to longstanding mingw warning  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: longstanding mingw warning
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 15:20, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> Why do we get this warning on Mingw?:
>
>   x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wformat-security
> -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -g -I../../../../src/include
> -I/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.3896/../pgsql/src/include
> -I../pgsql/src/include/port/win32 -DEXEC_BACKEND  -I/c/prog/mingwdep/include
> "-I/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.3896/../pgsql/src/include/port/win32"
> -DBUILDING_DLL  -c -o mingwcompat.o
> /home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.3896/../pgsql/src/backend/port/win32/mingwcompat.c
>
> c:/mingw/msys/1.0/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.3896/../pgsql/src/backend/port/win32/mingwcompat.c:60:1:
> warning: 'RegisterWaitForSingleObject' redeclared without dllimport
> attribute: previous dllimport ignored
>
>
> Can we get rid of it?

I don't recall this warning specifically - I wonder if it's specific
to certain version(s) of mingw? It's in mingwcompat.c simply because
the mingw API headers were broken. That warning sounds to me like you
suddenly have RegisterWaitForSingleObject present in the system
headers - can you check that it is?

If it is in the system headers, we need some way to check when it
appeared, and then add the function only if it isn't there. Either by
autoconf, or if we can make a simple hardcoded ifdef (since the file
is only ever compiled on mingw).

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: SSL-mode error reporting in libpq
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Enforcing that all WAL has been replayed after restoring from backup