Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyTDC1uEbF2PccLdA6hVGuqFuYemYimrBToLupu2usmjw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression  (gkokolatos@pm.me)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:34 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:15 PM <gkokolatos@pm.me> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The program pg_receivewal can use gzip compression to store the received WAL.
> > This patch teaches it to be able to use lz4 compression if the binary is build
> > using the -llz4 flag.
>
> +1 for the idea
>
> Some comments/suggestions on the patch
>
> 1.
> @@ -90,7 +91,8 @@ usage(void)
>   printf(_("      --synchronous      flush write-ahead log immediately
> after writing\n"));
>   printf(_("  -v, --verbose          output verbose messages\n"));
>   printf(_("  -V, --version          output version information, then exit\n"));
> - printf(_("  -Z, --compress=0-9     compress logs with given
> compression level\n"));
> + printf(_("  -I, --compress-program use this program for compression\n"));
>
> Wouldn't it be better to call it compression method instead of
> compression program?

I came here to say exactly that, just had to think up what I thought
was the better name first. Either method or algorithm, but method
seems like the much simpler choice and therefore better in this case.

Should is also then not be --compression-method, rather than --compress-method?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pgbench: add multiconnect option
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Numeric multiplication overflow errors