On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:04 PM Fujii Masao
<masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/04/23 18:46, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:10 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/04/22 18:23, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:28:11AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I found another small issue in pg_stat_statements docs. The following
> >>>> description in the docs should be updated so that toplevel is included?
> >>>>
> >>>>> This view contains one row for each distinct database ID, user ID and query ID
> >>>
> >>> Indeed! I'm adding Magnus in Cc.
> >>>
> >>> PFA a patch to fix at, and also mention that toplevel will only
> >>> contain True values if pg_stat_statements.track is set to top.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the patch! LGTM.
> >
> > Agreed, in general. But going by the example a few lines down, I
> > changed the second part to:
> > True if the query was executed as a top level statement
> > + (if <varname>pg_stat_statements.track</varname> is set to
> > + <literal>all</literal>, otherwise always false)
>
> Isn't this confusing? Users may mistakenly read this as that the toplevel
> column always indicates false if pg_stat_statements.track is not "all".
Hmm. I think you're right. It should say "always true", shouldn't it?
So not just confusing, but completely wrong? :)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
