Re: Improvement of pg_stat_statement usage about buffer hit ratio - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Improvement of pg_stat_statement usage about buffer hit ratio
Date
Msg-id CABUevEy9c=Wxtn2sHHUA9AADNg9FyenjuKqGYRTst6bvdUuvWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improvement of pg_stat_statement usage about buffer hit ratio  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
On 11/19/13, 11:30 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>> +1 from me.
>> >
>> >
>> > That's +1 for *not* including this?
> Right.

I agree with not including this.


If you're looking for more of those, here's another +1 for not including it. (And of course also for Peters comment about that we need to figure out if something is actually missing for building this higher level tool that can provide this information and more)
 
--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Time-Delayed Standbys
Next
From: Christian Kruse
Date:
Subject: Re: Time-Delayed Standbys