On 1/20/18 17:39, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> These are both clear bugs, and the docs one should definitely be both >> applied and backpatched. >> >> How much do we care about the error message when it comes to backpatching? >> Maybe we should leave that one to 11 only, to avoid breaking that, as the >> way it's written it's actually less wrong there. >> >> Thoughts? > > Thanks for your input! > > Applying the error message portion only on HEAD is a good plan, there is > no point to make the life of translaters unnecessary painful.
I would backpatch both. The updated error message is arguably easier to translate.
Fair enough. And since you do the translation merging at least, I'll go with that.
