Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC
Date
Msg-id CABUevExuXFedLYSgC3FJ9Q3dn-ViqauPf3PALCWEqjST7dzdow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC
List pgsql-hackers


On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 12/30/16 3:59 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I wonder if I missed part of the discussions around this, so maybe my
> understanding of the cases where this occurs is wrong, but isn't it the
> case of pretty much all (or actually) all the packaged versions of
> postgresql out there (debian, redhat etc) that they do the right thing,
> as in that they create "postgres" as a system user?

If you install a package but the user already exists, then the package
will just use that user.  So just using a package is not a guarantee
that everything will be alright.


Good point.

I still think that some wording in the direction of the fact that the majority of all users won't actually have this problem is the right thing to do (regardless of our previous history in the area as pointed out by Craig)
 
--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] identity columns
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults