Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side |
Date | |
Msg-id | CABUevExnhOD89zBDuPvfAAh243RzNpwCPEWNLtMYpKHMB8gbAQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Responses |
Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side
Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:19 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > > > > On 2020/03/10 22:43, Amit Langote wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:09 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > >>> So, I will make the patch adding support for --no-estimate-size option > >>> in pg_basebackup. > >> > >> Patch attached. > > > > Like the idea and the patch looks mostly good. > > Thanks for reviewing the patch! > > > + total size. If the estimation is disabled in > > + <application>pg_basebackup</application> > > + (i.e., <literal>--no-estimate-size</literal> option is specified), > > + this is always <literal>0</literal>. > > > > "always" seems unnecessary. > > Fixed. > > > + This option prevents the server from estimating the total > > + amount of backup data that will be streamed. In other words, > > + <literal>backup_total</literal> column in the > > + <structname>pg_stat_progress_basebackup</structname> > > + view always indicates <literal>0</literal> if this option is enabled. > > > > Here too. > > Fixed. > > Attached is the updated version of the patch. Would it perhaps be better to return NULL instead of 0 in the statistics view if there is no data? Also, should it really be the server version that decides how this feature behaves, and not the pg_basebackup version? Given that the implementation is entirely in the client, it seems that's more logical? and a few docs nitpicks: <para> Whether this is enabled or not, the <structname>pg_stat_progress_basebackup</structname> view - report the progress of the backup in the server side. But note - that the total amount of data that will be streamed is estimated - and reported only when this option is enabled. In other words, - <literal>backup_total</literal> column in the view always - indicates <literal>0</literal> if this option is disabled. + report the progress of the backup in the server side. + </para> + <para> + This option is not allowed when using + <option>--no-estimate-size</option>. </para> I think you should just remove that whole paragraph. The details are now listed under the disable parameter. + This option prevents the server from estimating the total + amount of backup data that will be streamed. In other words, + <literal>backup_total</literal> column in the + <structname>pg_stat_progress_basebackup</structname> + view indicates <literal>0</literal> if this option is enabled. I suggest just "This option prevents the server from estimating the total amount of backup data that will be streamed, resulting in the ackup_total column in pg_stat_progress_basebackup to be (zero or NULL depending on above)". (Markup needed on that of course ,but you get the idea) + When this is disabled, the backup will start by enumerating I'd try to avoid the double negation, with something "without this parameter, the backup will start..." + <para> + <application>pg_basebackup</application> asks the server to estimate + the total amount of data that will be streamed by default (unless + <option>--no-estimate-size</option> is specified) in version 13 or later, + and does that only when <option>--progress</option> is specified in + the older versions. + </para> That's an item for the release notes, not for the reference page, I think. It's already explained under the --disable parameter, so I suggest removing this paragraph as well. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
pgsql-hackers by date: