Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]
Date
Msg-id CABUevExJT7z99VNR=BEKQmRCKBfZsO=-ceRxs3H8ioOroMMPLA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]
List pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Oct 23, 2012 4:52 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" <<a
href="mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com">alvherre@2ndquadrant.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > Boszormenyi Zoltan
escribió:<br/> ><br /> > > >>Also, the check for conflict between -R and -x/-X is now removed.<br />
>><br /> > > The documentation for option -R has changed to reflect this and<br /> > > there is no
differenterror code 2 now: it would make the behaviour<br /> > > inconsistent between -Fp and -Ft.<br /> >
><br/> > > >>>The PQconninfo patch is also attached but didn't change since the last mail.<br />
><br/> > Magnus,<br /> ><br /> > This patch is all yours to handle.  I'm guessing nothing will happen<br />
>until <a href="http://pgconf.eu">pgconf.eu</a> is done and over, but hopefully you can share a few<br /> > beers
withZoltan over the whole subject (and maybe with Peter about the<br /> > PQconninfo stuff?)<br /> ><br /> >
I'mnot closing this just yet, but if you're not able to handle this<br /> > soon, maybe it'd be better to punt it to
theNovember commitfest.<p dir="ltr">It's on my to do list for when I get back, but correct, won't get to it until after
theconference. <p dir="ltr">/Magnus <br /> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: proposal and patch : support INSERT INTO...RETURNING with partitioned table using rule