On 2/22/18 12:38, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I'm not entirely sure which the others ones are. Auto-Vacuum obviously > is one, which doesn't use the worker infrastructure. But I'm not sure > which the others are referring to?
autovacuum, subscription workers, auto prewarm
Oh, for some reason I thought you were thinking in pending patches. Yeah, for those it makes sense -- though autovacuum isn't (currently) using background workers for what it does, the rest certainly makes sense to do something with.
