On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 17:40, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On 12.10.2011 18:20, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Well, it can't be a comment, but what about a real psql command?
>>> See my suggestion of using \echo.
>
>> Frankly I think a comment is sufficient. We can make it more complicated
>> later if people are still confused.
>
> The thing is that this will be the third time we've gone back to try to
> make it more apparent that you should use CREATE EXTENSION, and I no
> longer believe that mere documentation is really going to get the job
> done. Putting in a comment will only stop the bug reports from people
> who bother to examine the script contents before filing a report, but
> the kind of folks who don't read the release notes probably won't do
> that either. In fact, if we just put in a comment, I confidently
> predict we'll be coming back to revisit this issue again in future.
That's exactly my concern - I strongly doubt those not bothering to
read that even for a major release, aren't going to review the source
of the SQL scrpit either.
> The only thing the \echo approach will cost us is a few more lines of C
> code in execute_extension_script(), and I think it's more than worth
> that given the evident scope of the problem.
+1.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
