On Apr 29, 2016 05:38, "Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> On 2016-04-28 20:04:21 +0100, Nick Cleaton wrote:
> > On 28 April 2016 at 19:14, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >> in this test the server sent only 29 keepalives during the shutdown:
> > >> http://nick.cleaton.net/protodump-100k-nossl-patched.xz (47k)
> > >
> > > I guess you have a fair amount of WAL traffic, and the receiver was
> > > behind a good bit?
> >
> > No, IIRC this was on the test cluster that I installed for the purpose
> > of replicating the problem under 9.5; it was essentially idle.
>
> The reason I'm asking is that I so far can't really replicate the issue
> so far. It's pretty clear that waiting_for_ping_response = true; is
> needed, but I'm suspicious that that's not all.
>
> Was your standby on a separate machine? What kind of latency?
>
I had no problem reproducing it on my mostly idle laptop. Not enough to
make a proper slowdown, but if I instrumented the receiver it saw the
multiple packets every single time.
/Magnus
