On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:59, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 7/3/11 2:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. If there were One True Way to create a UUID, I would probably
>> agree that we should push that functionality into core. But there are
>> a lot of ways (and the reason for that is that they all suck in one
>> fashion or another :-(). Between that and the lack of portability of
>> many of the better ways, this is something I'm happy to keep at arm's
>> length.
>
> Also, I think that UUIDs fall into the class of "datatypes used by less
> than 10% of users" which should always remain extensions. I'd consider
> CITEXT for core before UUID.
UUID *is* in core. It's just the generation functions that aren't.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
