Re: could not link file "pg_xlog/xlogtemp.72606" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: could not link file "pg_xlog/xlogtemp.72606"
Date
Msg-id CABUevEwA9TFdA9WHtbjotbpU-bsR=cLw8DD2m_FYY8Of2h3n0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to could not link file "pg_xlog/xlogtemp.72606"  (Claire McLister <mclister@zeesource.net>)
Responses Re: could not link file "pg_xlog/xlogtemp.72606"  (Claire McLister <mclister@zeesource.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Claire McLister <mclister@zeesource.net> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>  We recently copied over our 8.3 database cluster files from a local disk to
> a network attached storage drive.
>
>  Everything seemed to work okay for a while until we got this error:
>
>  ERROR:  could not link file "pg_xlog/00000001000000AA00000030" to
> "pg_xlog/00000001000000AA00000096" (initialization of log file 170, segment
> 150): Operation not supported
>
>  pg_xlog/00000001000000AA00000096 does not exist in the original file tree,
> so I'm wondering if there's some special link that PG is trying to create
> that is not permitted in the NAS drive?

That's a regular (hard) link. Whether it's supported or not would
depend on your NAS, but it certainly looks like it's not supported by
yours - or you need different mount options. For example, if your NAS
runs something Windows-based, it's likely not supporting links at all.

Note that putting the data directory on a NAS is in general not a good
idea - it's very easy to get corruption that way, unless you are very
careful.



>  This is for Postgresql 8.3 + PostGIS 1.5

Also, do note that PostgreSQL 8.3 is no longer supported - see
http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/. You should look into
upgrading ASAP.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: What happens if I create new threads from within a postgresql function?
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is this a cross join?