Hi
> út 18. 12. 2018 v 16:11 odesílatel Filip Rembiałkowski <filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com> napsal:
>> Please share opinions if this makes sense at all, and has any chance
>> going upstream.
Clearly since Pavel has another implementation of the same concept,
there is some interest in this feature. :)
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:20 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> Still one my customer use a patch that implement FORCE on SQL level. It is necessary under higher load when is not
easyto synchronize clients.
I think Filip's approach of setting pg_database.datallowconn='false'
is pretty clever to avoid the synchronization problem. But it's also a
good idea to expose this functionality via DROP DATABASE in SQL, like
Pavel's patch, not just the 'dropdb' binary.
If this is to be accepted into PostgreSQL core, I think the two
approaches should be combined on the server side.
Regards,
Marti Raudsepp
