On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 21:43, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> (I do realize that allowing subtransactions to commit out of order
>> also makes it failure prone)
>
> Uhm? You can't "commit" savepoints out of order. You can "release" an
> older one, but then all the ones following it disappear and can't be
> released separately.
We're confused about the terminology already :)
I was talking about "autonomous subtransactions" as in COMMIT
SUBTRANSACTION from the proposal. Earlier I commented that it would be
nice if the syntax didn't require autonomous transactions to be
strictly nested.
Regards,
Marti
