Re: possible new option for wal_sync_method - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marti Raudsepp
Subject Re: possible new option for wal_sync_method
Date
Msg-id CABRT9RChp+51kn_Sm_vTtbmLgSfRHVp49GOYJYTgQoXc8zcCoA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to possible new option for wal_sync_method  (Dan Scales <scales@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 19:18, Dan Scales <scales@vmware.com> wrote:
> fsync/fdatasync can be very slow on ext3, because it seems to have to
> always wait for the current filesystem meta-data transaction to complete,
> even if that meta-data operation is completely unrelated to the file
> being fsync'ed.

Use the data=writeback mount option to remove this restriction. This
is actually the suggested setting for PostgreSQL file systems:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/wal-intro.html

(Note that this is unsafe for some other applications, so I wouldn't
use it on the root file system)

Regards,
Marti


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Designing an extension for feature-space similarity search
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: possible new option for wal_sync_method