Re: plpgsql.consistent_into - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marti Raudsepp
Subject Re: plpgsql.consistent_into
Date
Msg-id CABRT9RBkT2kAYaw1bQV9bs0Eb5L7usfQKEd33T33trPEuLkXYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpgsql.consistent_into  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
> Do we actually support = right now? We already support
>
> v_field := field FROM table ... ;
>
> and I think it's a bad idea to have different meaning for = and :=.

That was already discussed before. Yes, we support both = and := and
they have exactly the same behavior; I agree, we should keep them
equivalent.

Regards,
Marti



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: wal_buffers = -1
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance