On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, OK. I wasn't aware of this execution order. Now we could as well
> split the description flow into more tiny paragraphs but this does not
> seem worth it.
Agreed.
Actually now that I read it...
+ values. All aggregate functions and their argument expressions
+ in the <command>SELECT</> and <literal>HAVING</> are evaluated.
Perhaps should be:
<command>SELECT</> and <literal>HAVING</> clauses are evaluated.
Other than that, looks good to me.
Regards,
Marti
