Re: bgwriter reference to HOT standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: bgwriter reference to HOT standby
Date
Msg-id CABOikdNwaQPg=WX-w=yBTQP-83qk___+MRpmb58YiWXRsJaF+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to bgwriter reference to HOT standby  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: bgwriter reference to HOT standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby".  I don't think that in
> either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like an
> acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to do
> it.

I think it should it be "Hot Standby" for consistency. +1 for changing
it from HOT to hot/Hot anyway

Thanks,
Pavan

-- 
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: bgwriter reference to HOT standby
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: My first patch! (to \df output)