On 24 January 2013 07:25, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby". I don't think that in
>> either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like an
>> acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to do
>> it.
>
> I think it should it be "Hot Standby" for consistency. +1 for changing
> it from HOT to hot/Hot anyway
Patch applied. Thanks
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
